Original content vs Duplicate Content
For some time, many owners of blogs running scared from what is called 'duplicate
content 'penalty (ie, that they will be punished by the search engines to
have duplicate content on their Web site). Although duplicate content
punishment is now known to have been a myth ... whether it means you are free to
copy and paste as many articles on your blog maybe?
Ignoring the ethics and issues of intellectual property for a minute, if you will
to be the source of all your content from somewhere else, then eventually the reader
will catch. This is especially true if you are in a very specific niche
who do not have all that many websites are competing - look at the reader
go from one site to another web
Similarly, most of the PLR articles as a source of information, not
published material. They are too often used by published, republished,
and then published all over the internet again, so much so that their value as
content is quite low.
In each case, the original content is the reward itself. Such unique, that is what makes
people come to your blog as an authority site. Meanwhile, if you are known
be 'ripped off' from other sources, you probably will not end up being viewed as
reliable source that you want.
All this said though, the publication of some content syndication at the time
You can post your own for whatever reason (maybe you go on vacation with
money you make from your blog!) actually okay.
Make sure that when you do, you link back to the source in several ways.
To sum it up: If you must use content from other sources, efficient use, and
true. Also, make sure that the source you 'borrow' content from the
reliable, and does not have a problem with the content being 'borrowed